Re: RFC: sharing config interrupt between virtio devices for saving MSI

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 12:08:15PM +0800, Amos Kong wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I'm working on this item in Upstream Networking todolist:
> 
> | - Sharing config interrupts
> |    Support more devices by sharing a single msi vector
> |    between multiple virtio devices.
> |    (Applies to virtio-blk too).
> 
> I have this solution here, and only have draft patches of Solution
> 1 & 2, let's discuss if solution 3 is feasible.
> 
> * We should not introduce perf regression in this change
> * little effect is acceptable because we are _sharing_ interrupt
> 
> Solution 1:
> ==========
> share one LSI interrupt for configuration change of all virtio devices.
> Draft patch: share_lsi_for_all_config.patch
> 
> Solution 2:
> ==========
> share one MSI interrupt for configuration change of all virtio devices.
> Draft patch: share_msix_for_all_config.patch
> 
> Solution 3:
> ==========
> dynamic adjust interrupt policy when device is added or removed
> Current:
> -------
> - try to allocate a MSI to device's config
> - try to allocate a MSI for each vq
> - share one MSI for all vqs of one device
> - share one LSI for config & vqs of one device
> 
> additional dynamic policies:
> ---------------------------
> - if there is no enough MSI, adjust interrupt allocation for returning
>   some MSI
>    - try to find a device that allocated one MSI for each vq, change
>      it to share one MSI for saving the MSI
>    - try to share one MSI for config of all virtio_pci devices
>    - try to share one LSI for config of all devices
> 
> - if device is removed, try to re-allocate freed MSI to existed
>   devices, if they aren't in best status (one MSI for config, one
>   MSI for each vq)
>    - if config of all devices is sharing one LSI, try to upgrade it to MSI
>    - if config of all devices is sharing one MSI, try to allocate one
>      MSI for configuration change of each device
>    - try to find a device that is sharing one MSI for all vqs, try to
>      allocate one MSI for each vq
> 
> 
> 
> BTW, I saw we still notify all vqs even VIRTIO_PCI_ISR_CONFIG bit of
> isr is set, is it necessary?

[Reply myself]

Quote from Virtio-spec:

| 2.4.3 Dealing With Configuration Changes
| Some virtio PCI devices can change the device configuration state, as reflected
| in the virtio header in the PCI configuration space. In this case:
| 
| 1. If MSI-X capability is disabled: an interrupt is delivered and the sec-
| ond highest bit is set in the ISR Status field to indicate that the driver
| should re-examine the configuration space.

| Note that a single interrupt can
| indicate both that one or more virtqueue has been used and that the con-
| figuration space has changed: even if the config bit is set, virtqueues must
| be scanned. <<<<

It seems current code is fine.

 
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c
> index 101db3f..176aabc 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c
> @@ -259,9 +259,9 @@ static irqreturn_t vp_interrupt(int irq, void
> *opaque)
>  
>         /* Configuration change?  Tell driver if it wants to know. */
>         if (isr & VIRTIO_PCI_ISR_CONFIG)
> -               vp_config_changed(irq, opaque);
> -
> -       return vp_vring_interrupt(irq, opaque);
> +               return vp_config_changed(irq, opaque);
> +       else
> +               return vp_vring_interrupt(irq, opaque);
>  }
>  
>  static void vp_free_vectors(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> 
> -- 
> 			Amos.

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux