Re: [PATCH v9 03/19] qspinlock: Add pending bit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@xxxxxx> wrote:

> Because the qspinlock needs to touch a second cacheline; add a pending
> bit and allow a single in-word spinner before we punt to the second
> cacheline.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@xxxxxx>

This patch should have a "From: Peter" in it as well, right?

Thanks,

	Ingo
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux