* Waiman Long <waiman.long@xxxxxx> wrote: > On 04/04/2014 09:00 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > So I'm just not ever going to pick up this patch; I spend a week > > trying to reverse engineer this; I posted a 7 patch series > > creating the equivalent, but in a gradual and readable fashion: > > > > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140310154236.038181843@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > You keep on ignoring that; I'll keep on ignoring your patches. > > > > I might at some point rewrite some of your pv stuff on top to get > > this moving again, but I'm not really motivated to work with you > > atm. > > Peter, I am sorry that I have focused recently on making the > qspinlock patch works with virtualization and it is easier for me to > based off on my patch initially. Now the PV part is almost done, I > will apply them on top of your patch. Hopefully, I will get a new > patch out sometime next week. Note that it's not "a patch" that PeterZ posted, but a series of 7 finegrained patches, each properly documented and commented. Please preserve that work, build on top of it, and don't just ignore it! Thanks, Ingo _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
