Re: [PATCH v8 01/10] qspinlock: A generic 4-byte queue spinlock implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/04/2014 12:57 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 03:00:12PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
So I'm just not ever going to pick up this patch; I spend a week trying
to reverse engineer this; I posted a 7 patch series creating the
equivalent, but in a gradual and readable fashion:

   http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140310154236.038181843@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

You keep on ignoring that; I'll keep on ignoring your patches.

I might at some point rewrite some of your pv stuff on top to get this
moving again, but I'm not really motivated to work with you atm.
Uh? Did you CC also xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on your patches Peter?
I hadn't had a chance to see or comment on them :-(


Peter's patch is a rewrite of my patches 1-4, there is no PV or unfair lock support in there.

-Longman
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux