Venkatesh Srinivas <venkateshs@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Venkatesh Srinivas > <venkateshs@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> And I rewrote it substantially, mainly to take >>> VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC into account. >>> >>> As QEMU sets the vq size for PCI to 128, Venkatash's patch wouldn't >>> have made a change. This version does (since QEMU also offers >>> VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC. >> >> That divide-by-2 produced the same queue depth as the prior >> computation in QEMU was deliberate -- but raising it to 128 seems >> pretty reasonable. >> >> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Srinivas <venkateshs@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Soft ping about this patch. It's head of my virtio-next tree. Cheers, Rusty. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
