Re: [PATCH RFC v6 10/11] pvqspinlock, x86: Enable qspinlock PV support for KVM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Il 17/03/2014 18:47, Waiman Long ha scritto:
Yeah, what I mean is that the patches that enable paravirtualization
should also take care of decreasing the unfair-lock jump label when
paravirtualization is enabled.

As there are people who don't like unfair lock at all, I prefer to give
them the option to turn this on or off instead of forcing them to always
use unfair lock in a PV guest.

I understand, but this is virtualization after all. A bad scheduler decision means no progress at all. That's much worse than unfairness.

And also, KVM and Xen will stay fair, so if you want fairness just pick a hypervisor that supports it.

Paolo
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux