Forgot to ask... On 02/26, Waiman Long wrote: > > +notify_next: > + /* > + * Wait, if needed, until the next one in queue set up the next field > + */ > + while (!(next = ACCESS_ONCE(node->next))) > + arch_mutex_cpu_relax(); > + /* > + * The next one in queue is now at the head > + */ > + smp_store_release(&next->wait, false); Do we really need smp_store_release()? It seems that we can rely on the control dependency here. And afaics there is no need to serialise this store with other changes in *lock, plus they all have mb's anyway. Oleg. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
