On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It's simpler but we don't know if it's faster (and I don't believe that > matters for the current usage). > > If one of these functions starts to be used in the data path, at that > point it could be worth optimising, e.g. by doing a test for queue 0 and > only then doing the pointer arithmetic with its implicit division. Good catch, my statement above is incorrect. We don't know if this change is a performance win, and it does introduce an implicit div. I agree this function is not currently performance critical and is used only by for reporting values to sysfs. Best, Mike _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
