Hi Sebastian, Thanks for your review. The patch applies to the mainstream kernel, so seems there's difference between tip and the mainstream kernel. I will try to find the difference. And there's another patch for Xen, but I found the mail tile is wrong:( Please refer to: http://www.kernelhub.org/?msg=373208&p=2 Should I merge the patch for xen with the patch for native x86? Is there any dependency between them? Thanks! Gerry On 12/12/2013 06:10 AM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 05.12.13, Jiang Liu wrote: > > I like this in general however > >> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c >> index 7cf1689..f241792 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c >> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c >> @@ -560,7 +560,6 @@ static inline int xen_map_vector(int vector) >> xen_vector = XEN_RESCHEDULE_VECTOR; >> break; >> case CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR: >> - case CALL_FUNCTION_SINGLE_VECTOR: >> xen_vector = XEN_CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR; >> break; >> case IRQ_WORK_VECTOR: > > This chunk does not apply again tip's master branch, the code looks > different. You need to also kill XEN_CALL_FUNCTION_SINGLE_VECTOR which > is either part of a different patch or against a different tree. I > haven't seen a note in 0/19 or this patch description so I'm confused > here :) > > Sebastian > _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
