Re: [PATCH -tip v3 18/23] x86/dumpstack: Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL macro in dumpstack.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



(2013/11/21 20:30), Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL macro for protecting functions
>> from kprobes instead of __kprobes annotation in
>> dumpstack.c.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c |    9 ++++++---
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> Btw., all these mechanic changes of the __kprobes annotation can be 
> merged into a single patch. That will cut down on the size of the 
> series substantially.

Right, I just thought it would be easy to review for each
subsystem maintainer, because some of them including
forcibly (or explicitly) inlined changes (__always_inline).

Thank you,

-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
IT Management Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx


_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux