On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 08:14:21AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Wed, 2013-11-20 at 18:06 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > Hmm some kind of disconnect here. > > I got you rmanagement about bufferbloat. > > > > What I am saying is that maybe we should drop packets more > > aggressively: when we drop one packet of a flow, why not > > drop everything that's queued and is for the same flow? > > I really hope your TCP flows use SACK ;) > > Please read the rfc 2018 introduction for details. > > If a packet is dropped, it doesn't mean following packets _have_ to be > dropped. Got it, thanks. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
