* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 02:18:53 +0900 > Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > After that we can convert all the rest, probably as part of this series. > > > > OK, I'll do. :) > > BTW, converting all the __kprobes involves many archs, which > > kprobes ported. In that case, which mailing-list would better me > > to post the series, linux-arch? > > I would add linux-arch. > > Note, you may need to support both ways for the current time being, as > new __kprobes are being added (I've seen several in patches flying by in > LKML). We'd rather like to know about all cases where new code is added to kprobes (or where we missed to consider some existing code). It's really just a handful of annotations, the brunt of which is internal to kprobes. Thanks, Ingo _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
