On 08/07/2013 12:15 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
On 08/07/2013 10:18 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
tip:master is not a stable branch; it is more like linux-next. We need
to figure out which topic branches are dependencies for this set.
Okay. I 'll start looking at the branches that would get affected.
(Xen, kvm are obvious ones).
Please do let me know the branches I might have to check for.
On Linus tree,
I am seeing patch getting applied to arch/x86/Kconfig at some offset
Hunk #1 succeeded at 632 (offset -31 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 657 (offset -31 lines).
since patches are based on -rc4, Xen, kvm should not have problem
as pointed by Gleb, Konrad.
I did not see change in tip's jumplabel/core-spinlock tree that would
affect it.
Peter, could you please point me to the conflict, so that I can help
there which saves time and trouble to maintainers.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
