Re: [PATCH RFC V11 0/18] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/06/2013 04:20 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
So, having read through the entire thread I *think* this is what the
status of this patchset is:

1. Patches 1-17 are noncontroversial, Raghavendra is going to send an
    update split into two patchsets;

Yes.  Only one patch would be common to both host and guest which will
be sent as a separate patch.
I 'll rebase first patchset to -next and second patchset to kvm tree as
needed.

2. There are at least two versions of patch 15; I think the "PATCH
    RESEND RFC" is the right one.

True.

3. Patch 18 is controversial but there are performance numbers; these
    should be integrated in the patch description.

Current plan is to drop for patch 18 for now.

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux