On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 12:52:09AM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote: > x86/ticketlock: Don't inline _spin_unlock when using paravirt spinlocks > > From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > The code size expands somewhat, and its better to just call > a function rather than inline it. > > Thanks Jeremy for original version of ARCH_NOINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK config patch, > which is simplified. > > Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig > index 685692c..80fcc4b 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig > @@ -621,6 +621,7 @@ config PARAVIRT_DEBUG > config PARAVIRT_SPINLOCKS > bool "Paravirtualization layer for spinlocks" > depends on PARAVIRT && SMP > + select UNINLINE_SPIN_UNLOCK > ---help--- > Paravirtualized spinlocks allow a pvops backend to replace the > spinlock implementation with something virtualization-friendly > _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
