Re: [PATCH RFC V9 1/19] x86/spinlock: Replace pv spinlocks with pv ticketlocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/02/2013 02:02 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
On 06/01/2013 12:21 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
x86/spinlock: Replace pv spinlocks with pv ticketlocks

From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>
I'm not sure what the etiquette is here; I did the work while at Citrix,
but jeremy@xxxxxxxx is my canonical email address.  The Citrix address
is dead and bounces, so is useless for anything.  Probably best to
change it.


Agreed.
I would change to goop address in the next posting.
I had the same doubt for Vatsa's email also. Even I am not sure about
the practice here. So had kept as is.


_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux