On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:47:52AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 01:49:13PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 09:15:03AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> >> > On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 11:42:56 +0200, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > > On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 09:09:33PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> >> > > > +/* There is no iowrite64. We use two 32-bit ops. */
> >> > > > +static void iowrite64(u64 val, const __le64 *addr)
> >> > > > +{
> >> > > > + iowrite32((u32)val, (__le32 *)addr);
> >> > > > + iowrite32(val >> 32, (__le32 *)addr + 1);
> >> > > > +}
> >> > > > +
> >> > >
> >> > > Let's put addr_lo/addr_hi in the structure then,
> >> > > to make the fact this field is not atomic explicit?
> >> >
> >> > Good point, assuming I haven't missed something.
> >> >
> >> > Are 64-bit accesses actually unknown in PCI-land? Or is this a limited
> >> > availability thing?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Rusty.
> >>
> >> I think PCI can optionally support atomic 64 bit accesses, but not all
> >> architectures can generate them.
> >
> > Ping. Going to change this in the layout struct?
>
> Not sure what you mean.... We use a queue_enable field, so it doesn't
> matter if the accesses aren't atomic for that.
>
> Cheers,
> Rusty.
I mean the struct should have separate _lo and _hi fields.
Otherwise I have to do:
+ case offsetof(struct virtio_pci_common_cfg, queue_desc):
+ assert(size == 4);
+ return virtio_queue_get_desc_addr(vdev, vdev->queue_sel) & low;
+ case offsetof(struct virtio_pci_common_cfg, queue_desc) + 4:
+ assert(size == 4);
+ return virtio_queue_get_desc_addr(vdev, vdev->queue_sel) >> 32;
Would be nicer as:
+ case offsetof(struct virtio_pci_common_cfg, queue_desc_lo):
+ assert(size == sizeof cfg.queue_desc_lo);
+ return virtio_queue_get_desc_addr(vdev, vdev->queue_sel) & low;
+ case offsetof(struct virtio_pci_common_cfg, queue_desc_hi):
+ assert(size == sizeof cfg.queue_desc_hi);
+ return virtio_queue_get_desc_addr(vdev, vdev->queue_sel) >> 32;
Agree?
--
MST
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
