Re: [PATCH] virtio-spec: tweak wording for console control vq

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> control vq is only used if feature bit is
> negotiated - it's not enough that device supports
> it. Clarify this in the spec.

Thanks, applied.

Cheers,
Rusty.

> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  virtio-spec.lyx | 9 +++++++--
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/virtio-spec.lyx b/virtio-spec.lyx
> index 921388b..3ef96a9 100644
> --- a/virtio-spec.lyx
> +++ b/virtio-spec.lyx
> @@ -6833,8 +6833,13 @@ VIRTIO_CONSOLE_F_SIZE
>  
>  \begin_layout Description
>  VIRTIO_CONSOLE_F_MULTIPORT(1) Device has support for multiple ports; configurati
> -on fields nr_ports and max_nr_ports are valid and control virtqueues will
> - be used.
> +on fields nr_ports and max_nr_ports are valid
> +\change_inserted 1986246365 1347188404
> +; if this bit is negotiated,
> +\change_deleted 1986246365 1347188406
> + and
> +\change_unchanged
> + control virtqueues will be used.
>  \change_inserted 1112500848 1368412890
>  
>  \end_layout
> -- 
> MST
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization




[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux