On Mon, 8 Apr 2013, Kees Cook wrote: > > FWIW the change looks reasonable to me, however given that that it makes > > the arrangement unconditional and there is no longer a workaround to > > enable I think it would make sense to remove the conditional block quoted > > above altogether, along with the f00f_workaround_enabled variable itself > > (alternatively "Intel Pentium with F0 0F bug" alone could be printed > > instead and the name of the variable adjusted to make sense with the new > > meaning -- up to you to decide). > > Actually, I take it back. The other portion of the workaround is still > active (in mm/fault.c), and this chunk announces it, so I'm going to > leave it as-is. Ah, OK then. Thanks for double-checking. Maciej _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
