Asias He <asias@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 04:15:02PM +1100, Rusty Russell wrote: >> OK, so I've spent a few days benchmarking. Turns out 80% of >> virtio_add_buf cases are uni-directional (including the >> always-performance-sensitive networking code), and that gets no >> performance penalty (though tests with real networking would be >> appreciated!). >> >> I'm not reposting all the "convert driver to virtio_add_outbuf()" >> patches: just the scsi one which I didn't have before. I won't actually >> remove virtio_add_buf() until the *following* merge window, just to be >> sure. > > Why not send out all the patches in this series? It would be much easier > for people to read in one thread. I could re-spam people, but the patches are unchanged and uninteresting: the scsi one I wanted an Ack for, however. I really want people to review the core patches, and if they're fine, I'll post the whole thing one last time before putting them in my virtio-next branch (where they can't change). Cheers, Rusty. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
