On Thu, 28 Feb 2013, Kees Cook wrote: > The CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL config item has not carried much meaning for a > while now and is almost always enabled by default. As agreed during the > Linux kernel summit, remove it from any "depends on" lines in Kconfigs. > > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > v2: > - drop EXPERIMENTAL from bool and help text too. > > --- > arch/x86/xen/Kconfig | 8 +++----- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/Kconfig b/arch/x86/xen/Kconfig > index 93ff4e1..6c5802f 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/xen/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/x86/xen/Kconfig > @@ -52,12 +52,10 @@ config XEN_DEBUG_FS > Enabling this option may incur a significant performance overhead. > > config XEN_X86_PVH > - bool "Support for running as a PVH guest (EXPERIMENTAL)" > - depends on X86_64 && XEN && EXPERIMENTAL > + bool "Support for running as a PVH guest" > + depends on X86_64 && XEN > default n > help > This option enables support for running as a PVH guest (PV guest > using hardware extensions) under a suitably capable hypervisor. > - This option is EXPERIMENTAL because the hypervisor interfaces > - which it uses is not yet considered stable therefore backwards and > - forwards compatibility is not yet guaranteed. If unsure, say N. > + If unsure, say N. Please do not change the text this way. The fact that CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL is going away it doesn't change the fact that this feature is experimental. Maybe you want to replace EXPERIMENTAL with experimental, or if experimental has become as taboo word, I am sure you can find a suitable synonym. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
