On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 09:12:57AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 02/22/2013 08:55 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >
> >What is bizzare is that I do recall testing this (and Stefano also did it).
> >So I am not sure what has altered.
> >
>
> Yes, there was a very specific reason why I wanted you guys to test it...
Exactly. And I re-ran the same test, but with a new kernel. This is what
git reflog tells me:
473cd24 HEAD@{75}: checkout: moving from 08f321ed97353cf3b3fafa6b1c1971d6a8970830 to linux-next
08f321e HEAD@{76}: checkout: moving from linux-next to yinghai/for-x86-mm
eb827a7 HEAD@{77}: checkout: moving from 1b66ccf15ff4bd0200567e8d70446a8763f96ee7 to linux-next
[konrad@build linux]$ git show 08f321e
commit 08f321ed97353cf3b3fafa6b1c1971d6a8970830
Author: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu Nov 8 00:00:19 2012 -0800
mm: Kill NO_BOOTMEM version free_all_bootmem_node()
And I recall Stefano later on testing (I was in a conference and did not have
the opportunity to test it). Not sure what he ran with.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
