On (Mon) 11 Feb 2013 [14:12:52], Sjur Brændeland wrote: > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Amit Shah <amit.shah@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On (Thu) 17 Jan 2013 [13:23:17], sjur.brandeland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > From: Sjur Brændeland <sjur.brandeland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Use virtio device index for creating unique device port names. > > > Current index allocation in virtio is based on a monotonically > > > increasing variable "index". A better handling of this is to > > > use device index which is allocated by ida. > > > > This should be fine. I'm wondering, though, if there's something else > > you need from the naming scheme (esp. considering the next patch)? > > This current patch solves the most critical issue - that the device name > changes for every modem reboot. This is a show-stopper for me. So it would > be > great if this patch could go upstream. The other problem that device name > is non-deterministic is currently only a theoretical problem as we have > only one > remoteproc device. OK - I've no problem with the patch. Amit _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
