Hi Dave, > >> Instead, what I remember doing was deferring to the feedback these > >> folks received, stating that ideas that the virtio people had > >> mentioned should be considered instead. > >> > >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=135301515818462&w=2 > > > > I believe Andy replied to Anthony's AF_VMCHANNEL post and the > > differences between the proposed solutions. > > I'd much rather see a hypervisor neutral solution than a hypervisor > specific one which this certainly is. We've addressed this with the latest patch series, which I sent earlier today. vSockets now has support for pluggable transports, of which VMCI happens to be the first; all transport code is separated out into its own module. So the core is now hypervisor neutral. Given that, would you be willing to re-consider it, please? If at all possible, we'd like to make the current merge window. Thanks so much! - Andy _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
