Sjur Brændeland <sjurbren@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hi Rusty, > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > >> Getting use of virtio rings correct is tricky, and a recent patch saw >> an implementation of in-kernel rings (as separate from userspace). >> >> This patch attempts to abstract the business of dealing with the >> virtio ring layout from the access (userspace or direct); to do this, >> we use function pointers, which gcc inlines correctly. > > > I have been using your patches for a while in my test setup without any > issues with vringh. The only thing I'm missing is export of symbols. > My current caif_virtio driver expects vringh to be a module exporting > symbols. Is this something you are planning to add? Yes, sure. There may be some more minor changes, but nothing radical. > I guess my vringh related stuff should go into your tree together with your > vringh patches... > Would you be willing to take this via your tree, provided that I get acks > from the right people? Yes please. Now I have set up a test rig for vhost (unfortunately not with 10Ge) I can make progress on vhost adaption. Thanks, Rusty. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
