Re: [Pv-drivers] [PATCH 0/6] VSOCK for Linux upstreaming

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2012-11-15 at 15:32 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> 
> The concept was Nacked and that led to the abomination of virtio-serial.  If an 
> address family for virtualization is on the table, we should reconsider 
> AF_VMCHANNEL.
> 
> I'd be thrilled to get rid of virtio-serial...

Ack.

Ben.


_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization


[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux