Amit Shah <amit.shah@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On (Mon) 05 Nov 2012 [11:31:24], Amit Shah wrote: >> On (Mon) 05 Nov 2012 [09:11:45], Rusty Russell wrote: >> > Sjur Brændeland <sjur@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> > >> > > From: Sjur Brændeland <sjur.brandeland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > > >> > > This patch-set introduces a new virtio type "rproc_serial" for communicating >> > > with remote processors over shared memory. The driver depends on the >> > > the remoteproc framework. As preparation for introducing "rproc_serial" >> > > I've done a refactoring of the transmit buffer handling. >> > > >> > > Changes since v7: >> > > - Rebased to virtio-next branch. >> > > - Removed extra added lines. >> > > - Removed superfluous checks before calling reclaim_dma_bufs(). >> > > - Rusty raised some question regarding garbage collection of the >> > > out-vq, so I moved this into a separate patch. >> > >> > OK, I'm not sure that WARN_ON won't fire, but that's not all that >> > harmful. >> >> Sjur said he'll send out a respin for this; can you wait for his v8? > > Er, v9. > > Amit Yep, they're in my pending-rebases tree now. Though no need to repost the whole series; just the changes please. Cheers, Rusty. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
