Re: [Pv-drivers] [PATCH 00/12] VMCI for Linux upstreaming

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 09:18:07AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > I think that even if we had a special directory for vmci having network
> > > drivers in Dave's realm and pvscsi in James's is best option, so the new
> > > directory would contain vmci and the balloon driver (vsock will go into
> > > net/).  Given that balloon is already in drivers/misc it looked like
> > > obvious place for VMCI as well.
> > 
> > I agree that the individual drivers should go in the subsystem area,
> > it's this "hypervisor bus core" type code that I'm questioning.  Right
> > now every hypervisor is putting that logic in a different place in the
> > kernel, having some consistency here would be nice.
> 
> Hmm, I wonder if miscellaneous and core hypervisor drivers should end
> up in drivers/platform:
> 
> 	drivers/platform/hyperv
> 	drivers/platform/olpc
> 	drivers/platform/vmware
> 	drivers/platform/xen
> 	drivers/platform/x86

That makes sense to me, nice.

> But really we'd like to get VMCI into mainline first and move to a new
> place later if such a better place is found.

Heh, no one wants to fight for something to help everyone out, they just
want their own code accepted :)

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization


[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux