[PATCH 5/5] virtio: make virtqueue_add_buf() returning 0 on success, not capacity.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Now noone relies on this behavior, we simplify virtqueue_add_buf() so it
return 0 or -errno.

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c |    7 ++-----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
index 335dcec..5fde312 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
@@ -181,10 +181,7 @@ static int vring_add_indirect(struct vring_virtqueue *vq,
  * Caller must ensure we don't call this with other virtqueue operations
  * at the same time (except where noted).
  *
- * Returns remaining capacity of queue or a negative error
- * (ie. ENOSPC).  Note that it only really makes sense to treat all
- * positive return values as "available": indirect buffers mean that
- * we can put an entire sg[] array inside a single queue entry.
+ * Returns zero or a negative error (ie. ENOSPC, ENOMEM).
  */
 int virtqueue_add_buf(struct virtqueue *_vq,
 		      struct scatterlist sg[],
@@ -284,7 +281,7 @@ add_head:
 	pr_debug("Added buffer head %i to %p\n", head, vq);
 	END_USE(vq);
 
-	return vq->vq.num_free;
+	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(virtqueue_add_buf);
 
-- 
1.7.9.5

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization


[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux