Re: [patch 1/3] xen/privcmd: check for integer overflow in ioctl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sep 8, 2012, at 5:52 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:

> If m.num is too large then the "m.num * sizeof(*m.arr)" multiplication
> could overflow and the access_ok() check wouldn't test the right size.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andres@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Only needed in linux-next.
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/privcmd.c b/drivers/xen/privcmd.c
> index 215a3c0..fdff8f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/privcmd.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/privcmd.c
> @@ -325,6 +325,8 @@ static long privcmd_ioctl_mmap_batch(void __user *udata, int version)
> 			return -EFAULT;
> 		/* Returns per-frame error in m.arr. */
> 		m.err = NULL;
> +		if (m.num > SIZE_MAX / sizeof(*m.arr))
> +			return -EINVAL;
> 		if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, m.arr, m.num * sizeof(*m.arr)))
> 			return -EFAULT;
> 		break;
> @@ -332,6 +334,8 @@ static long privcmd_ioctl_mmap_batch(void __user *udata, int version)
> 		if (copy_from_user(&m, udata, sizeof(struct privcmd_mmapbatch_v2)))
> 			return -EFAULT;
> 		/* Returns per-frame error code in m.err. */
> +		if (m.num > SIZE_MAX / sizeof(*m.err))
> +			return -EINVAL;
> 		if (!access_ok(VERIFY_WRITE, m.err, m.num * (sizeof(*m.err))))
> 			return -EFAULT;
> 		break;

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization


[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux