On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 01:54:17PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> @@ -575,15 +630,19 @@ static struct scsi_host_template virtscsi_host_template = {
> &__val, sizeof(__val)); \
> })
>
> +
Pls don't add empty lines.
> static void virtscsi_init_vq(struct virtio_scsi_vq *virtscsi_vq,
> - struct virtqueue *vq)
> + struct virtqueue *vq, bool affinity)
> {
> spin_lock_init(&virtscsi_vq->vq_lock);
> virtscsi_vq->vq = vq;
> + if (affinity)
> + virtqueue_set_affinity(vq, virtqueue_get_queue_index(vq) -
> + VIRTIO_SCSI_VQ_BASE);
> }
>
This means in practice if you have less virtqueues than CPUs,
things are not going to work well, will they?
Any idea what to do?
--
MST
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
