Re: [PATCH V3 3/3] virtio-blk: Add bio-based IO path for virtio-blk

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/28/2012 02:42 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
I'm not sure what the correct behavior for bio & cacheflush is, if
any.

REQ_FLUSH is not supported in the bio path.

Ouch, that's correct:

@@ -414,7 +529,7 @@ static void virtblk_update_cache_mode(struct virtio_device *vdev)
  	u8 writeback = virtblk_get_cache_mode(vdev);
  	struct virtio_blk *vblk = vdev->priv;

-	if (writeback)
+	if (writeback && !use_bio)
  		blk_queue_flush(vblk->disk->queue, REQ_FLUSH);
  	else
  		blk_queue_flush(vblk->disk->queue, 0);

then it is not safe against power losses.

Yes. Something like this:

  qemu -drive file=foo.img,cache=writeback/unsafe

is not safe against power losses also?

I think we can add REQ_FLUSH & REQ_FUA support to bio path and that deserves another patch.

--
Asias
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization


[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux