On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 02:31:25PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote: > On 07/24/2012 02:28 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 02:26:33PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote: > >> On 07/24/2012 09:44 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > >>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:32:39PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote: > >>>> As it was discussed recently, there's currently no way for the guest to notify > >>>> the host about panics. Further more, there's no reasonable way to notify the > >>>> host of other critical events such as an OOM kill. > >>>> > >>>> This short patch series introduces a new device named virtio-notifier which > >>>> does two simple things: > >>>> > >>>> 1. Provide a simple interface for the guest to notify the host of critical > >>> To get early OOPSes virtio will have to be compiled into the kernel. If > >>> your are so keen on using virtio for this though, why not just use > >>> dedicated virtio serial channel? > >> > >> Let's separate between having log for these events and receiving notifications about them. > >> > >> For the log part, I can already run a simple serial console to dump everything somewhere. I'm more concerned about having notifications about something critical happening when the guest is already up and running. > >> > > I am talking about notifications. Run your notification protocol over > > dedicated virtio-serial channel. Logs goes to virtio-console as you've > > said. > > Ah, so just add another channel into virtio-serial to pass these notifications? Good idea - I'll look into it. > Yes, that's what I mean. This solution still has the disadvantage of not been able to catch early boot oopses without compiling the whole virtio into a kernel image. -- Gleb. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
