On 07/24/2012 07:55 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 22:32:39 +0200, Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
As it was discussed recently, there's currently no way for the guest to notify
the host about panics. Further more, there's no reasonable way to notify the
host of other critical events such as an OOM kill.
I clearly missed the discussion. Is this actually useful? In practice,
Admit this is not a killer feature..
won't you want the log from the guest? What makes a virtual guest
different from a physical guest?
Most times virt guest can do better than a physical OS. In that sense,
this is where virtualization shines (live migration, hotplug for any
virtual resource including net/block/cpu/memory/..).
There are plenty of niche but worth while small features such as the
virtio-trace series and other that allow the host/virt-mgmt to get more
insight into the guest w/o a need to configure the guest.
In theory guest OOM can trigger a host memory hot plug action. Again, I
don't see it as a key feature..
Guest watchdog functionality might be useful, but that's simpler to
There is already a fully emulated watchdog device in qemu.
Cheers,
Dor
implement via a virtio watchdog device, and more effective to implement
via a host facility that actually pings guest functionality (rather than
the kernel).
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
