On Thu, 5 Jul 2012 15:22:25 +0300, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 12:07:07PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > The KVM list is followed by more people than the generic > > virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx mailing list, and is > > already "de facto" the place where virtio patches are posted. > > I have no data on the first statement (do you?) and I disagree with the > last statement, but have no objection to people adding kvm list as well. Well, the kvm list is far more active. It's annoying to have two lists, but it is how things are so best to document it. I'm OK with the original commit message, but MST is smarter than me, so let's do what he suggests :) Cheers, Rusty. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
