On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 02:05:17PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote: > On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 14:54 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 02:36:43PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > > On Wed, 9 Nov 2011, Sasha Levin wrote: > > > >They don't exist in kernel code either, for same reason as above. > > > > > > > >Nothing will break if we remove it since no one really used it, we were > > > >probably the first and only implementation of the spec which considered > > > >them :) > > > > > > As long as we are able to run older versions of the KVM tool with > > > newer kernels and vice versa, I see no reason why we can't drop > > > 64-bit features from the KVM tool. > > > > > > Pekka > > > > So what happened? Did you guys do this? Need to know what to do to make > > progress. IIUC Rusty removed the new fields in 0.9.3. > > Does your tool still use them? Did any version of the tool released by > > distros do so? > > Yup, they were removed quite a while ago. Thanks, that's nice. So we can reuse that bit if we need it and it won't break your code. -- MST _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
