On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 13:39 -0700, Rick Jones wrote:
> On 06/07/2012 01:24 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 13:05 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> >> From: Ben Hutchings<bhutchings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 18:15:06 +0100
> >>
> >>> I would really like to see some sort of convention for presenting
> >>> per-queue statistics through ethtool. At the moment we have a complete
> >>> mess of different formats:
> >>
> >> Indeed. Probably ${QUEUE_TYPE}-${INDEX}-${STATISTIC} is best.
> >> With an agreed upon list of queue types such as "rx", "tx", "rxtx"
> >> etc.
> >
> > I think we should leave the type names open-ended, as there are other
> > useful groupings like per-virtual-port. In that case the separator
> > should be chosen to allow arbitrary type names without ambiguity.
>
> So you mean like something along the lines of the presence of say '.'
> indicating indent a level:
>
> rx_bytes: 1234
> myqueue1.rx_bytes: 234
> myqueue2.rx_bytes: 345
> ...
Most drivers seem to want this sort of ordering/grouping:
group0.foo
group0.bar
...
group1.foo
group1.bar
...
but if we have a standard way of indicating groups of statistics then
the user can choose whether they want to reorder by type name.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
