On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 23:16 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 10:08:09PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 22:58 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > Absolutely, I am talking about virtio here. I'm not kicking > > > u64_stats_sync idea I am just saying that simple locking > > > would work for virtio and might be better as it > > > gives us a way to get counters atomically. > > > > Which lock do you own in the RX path ? > > We can just disable napi, everything is updated from napi callback. This is very disruptive, and illegal from ndo_get_stats64() (ndo_get_stats64() is not allowed to sleep, and I cant see how you are going to disable napi without sleeping) _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization