On Mon, 28 May 2012 15:53:25 +0300, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 12:19:54PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > disable_cb is just an optimization: it > > can not guarantee that there are no callbacks. > > > > I didn't yet figure out whether a callback > > in freeze will trigger a bug, but disable_cb > > won't address it in any case. So let's remove > > the useless calls as a first step. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Looks like this isn't in the 3.5 pull request - > just lost in the shuffle? > disable_cb is advisory so can't be relied upon. I always (try to?) reply as I accept patches. This one did slip by, but it's harmless so no need to push AFAICT. Applied. Thanks! Rusty. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
