>>> On 07.05.12 at 19:25, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: (apologies for the late reply, the mail just now made it to my inbox via xen-devel) > I'll hold off on the whole thing - frankly, we don't want this > kind of Xen-only complexity. If KVM can make use of PLE then Xen > ought to be able to do it as well. It does - for fully virtualized guests. For para-virtualized ones, it can't (as the hardware feature is an extension to VMX/SVM). > If both Xen and KVM makes good use of it then that's a different > matter. I saw in a later reply that you're now tending towards trying it out at least - thanks. Jan _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
