On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:49:43AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, guys. > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 04:34:06PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > Why not use 'base' below? neither unit nor base change. > > > > Yes it's a bit strange, it was the same in Tejun's patch. > > Tejun, any idea? > > It was years ago, so I don't recall much. I think I wanted to use a > variable name which signifies its role - I worked out the rather > convoluted base number logic on paper first and I probably wanted to > keep the distinctions. I don't think it really matters at this point > tho. Just make sure those functions are marked deprecated so that no > one else copies them. > > Thanks. I guess I'll keep it same so it's easier to deduplicate if someon wants to. > -- > tejun _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
