Re: question about napi_disable (was Re: [PATCH] virtio_net: set/cancel work on ndo_open/ndo_stop)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/04/2012 05:32 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 09:12:38PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>  Michael S. Tsirkin noticed that we could run the refill work after
>  ndo_close, which can re-enable napi - we don't disable it until
>  virtnet_remove.  This is clearly wrong, so move the workqueue control
>  to ndo_open and ndo_stop (aka. virtnet_open and virtnet_close).
> > One subtle point: virtnet_probe() could simply fail if it couldn't
>  allocate a receive buffer, but that's less polite in virtnet_open() so
>  we schedule a refill as we do in the normal receive path if we run out
>  of memory.
> > Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell<rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Doh.
napi_disable does not prevent the following
napi_schedule, does it?

Can someone confirm that I am not seeing things please?
Looks like napi_disable() does prevent the following scheduling, as napi_schedule_prep() returns true only when there's an 0 -> 1 transition of NAPI_STATE_SCHED bit.
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization


[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux