On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Ren Mingxin <renmx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, He: > > > On 03/30/2012 07:22 PM, Asias He wrote: >> >> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Ren Mingxin<renmx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> The current virtblk's naming algorithm only supports 263 disks. >>> If there are mass of virtblks(exceeding 263), there will be disks >>> with the same name. >> >> This fix is pretty nice. However, current virtblk's naming still >> supports up to 18278 disks, no? >> ( index 0 -> vda, index 18277 -> vdzzz ). > > > Sorry, I intended to type 26^3+ (26^2+26)... > It may still be a restriction which should be improved though. OK. -- Asias He _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
