On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Asias He <asias@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Benchmark shows small performance improvement on fusion io device. > > Before: > seq-read : io=1,024MB, bw=19,982KB/s, iops=39,964, runt= 52475msec > seq-write: io=1,024MB, bw=20,321KB/s, iops=40,641, runt= 51601msec > rnd-read : io=1,024MB, bw=15,404KB/s, iops=30,808, runt= 68070msec > rnd-write: io=1,024MB, bw=14,776KB/s, iops=29,552, runt= 70963msec > > After: > seq-read : io=1,024MB, bw=20,343KB/s, iops=40,685, runt= 51546msec > seq-write: io=1,024MB, bw=20,803KB/s, iops=41,606, runt= 50404msec > rnd-read : io=1,024MB, bw=16,221KB/s, iops=32,442, runt= 64642msec > rnd-write: io=1,024MB, bw=15,199KB/s, iops=30,397, runt= 68991msec > > Signed-off-by: Asias He <asias@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 10 ---------- > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) Thanks for providing performance results. It's a bit scary that this unused list has an impact...I'm sure we have worse things elsewhere in the KVM storage code path. Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
