Re: [PATCH] virtio-spec: split virtio-net device status filed into ro and rw byte

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/18/2012 08:22 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 11:20:26PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
This patch splits the device status field of virtio-net into ro and rw
byte. This would simplify the implementation of both host and guest
and make the layout more clean. As VIRTIO_NET_S_ANNOUNCE is a rw bit,
it was moved to bit 8 (0x100).

btw. looks like there's no implementation that depends on
VIRTIO_NET_S_ANNOUNCE, so the move is safe.

Signed-off-by: Jason Wang<jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Hmm, I know I proposed this myself, and I thought it will
prevent problems if we will add more rw bits,
but I missed the following race:

host writes VIRTIO_NET_S_ANNOUNCE = 1, interrupt

				guest reads VIRTIO_NET_S_ANNOUNCE = 1

host writes VIRTIO_NET_S_SOME_NEW_FIELD = 1, interrupt

				guest writes VIRTIO_NET_S_ANNOUNCE = 0
				VIRTIO_NET_S_SOME_NEW_FIELD is overwritten

				guest reads VIRTIO_NET_S_SOME_NEW_FIELD = 0

How about making the new bit write 1 to clear?
If we do, we can keep it where it is currently ...


Didn't follow, do you mean to make VIRITO_NET_S_ANNOUNCE bit clear on read? Looks like this can prevent the race and keep what currently we have.


---
  virtio-0.9.4.lyx |   20 +++++++++++++++++++-
  1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/virtio-0.9.4.lyx b/virtio-0.9.4.lyx
index 6c7bab1..ef3951c 100644
--- a/virtio-0.9.4.lyx
+++ b/virtio-0.9.4.lyx
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@
  \html_be_strict false
  \author -608949062 "Rusty Russell,,,"
  \author 1531152142 "pbonzini"
+\author 2090695081 "Jason"
  \end_header

  \begin_body
@@ -4012,8 +4013,19 @@ configuration
  layout Two configuration fields are currently defined.
   The mac address field always exists (though is only valid if VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC
   is set), and the status field only exists if VIRTIO_NET_F_STATUS is set.
+
+\change_inserted 2090695081 1331907586
+ The low byte of status field is read-only, guest write to this byte would
+ be ignored.
+ Currently only one bit is defined for this byte: VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP.
+ The high byte of status field is read-writable.
+ Currently only one bit is defined for this byte: VIRTIO_NET_S_ANNOUNCE.
+
+\change_deleted 2090695081 1331907489
   Two bits are currently defined for the status field: VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP
   and VIRTIO_NET_S_ANNOUNCE.
+
+\change_unchanged

  \begin_inset listings
  inline false
@@ -4026,7 +4038,13 @@ status open

  \begin_layout Plain Layout

-#define VIRTIO_NET_S_ANNOUNCE	2
+#define VIRTIO_NET_S_ANNOUNCE	
+\change_inserted 2090695081 1331907493
+0x100
+\change_deleted 2090695081 1331907491
+2
+\change_unchanged
+
  \end_layout

  \begin_layout Plain Layout
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization


[Index of Archives]     [KVM Development]     [Libvirt Development]     [Libvirt Users]     [CentOS Virtualization]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux