On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 01:23:05PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 11:29:20AM -0500, Andrew Jones wrote: > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 06:51:41PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote: > > > > PV-on-HVM guests may want to use the xen keyboard/mouse frontend, > > > > but > > > > they don't use the xen frame buffer frontend. For this case it > > > > doesn't > > > > > > Ok, but PV does? > > > > make much sense for INPUT_XEN_KBDDEV_FRONTEND to depend on > > > > XEN_FBDEV_FRONTEND. The opposite direction always makes more sense, > > > > i.e. > > > > if you're using xenfb, then you'll want xenkbd. Switch the > > > > dependencies. > > > > > > That sounds like it would be universal irregardless if it is > > > PV or PVonHVM? > > > > This patch makes it such that if you want to use both, then you must > > select both. It also says that if you want FB, then you need the > > KBD. However, if you only want the KBD then you're fine with just > > that. So there isn't any risk of breaking configs designed to use > > FB, because FB should be manually selected for those configs anyway. > > Dmitry, > > I am OK with this patch. Should I pick it up on my tree for 3.4 or > are you OK doing it via your tree? Konrad, I don't have a good copy of the patch so it you could pick it up that would be great. Thanks. -- Dmitry _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
