On 01/16/2012 09:27 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
[...]
Result for PLE machine:
======================
Machine : IBM xSeries with Intel(R) Xeon(R) X7560 2.27GHz CPU with 32/64 core, with 8
online cores and 4*64GB RAM
Kernbench:
BASE BASE+patch %improvement
mean (sd) mean (sd)
Scenario A:
case 1x: 161.263 (56.518) 159.635 (40.5621) 1.00953
case 2x: 190.748 (61.2745) 190.606 (54.4766) 0.0744438
case 3x: 227.378 (100.215) 225.442 (92.0809) 0.851446
Scenario B:
446.104 (58.54 ) 433.12733 (54.476) 2.91
Dbench:
Throughput is in MB/sec
NRCLIENTS BASE BASE+patch %improvement
mean (sd) mean (sd)
8 1.101190 (0.875082) 1.700395 (0.846809) 54.4143
16 1.524312 (0.120354) 1.477553 (0.058166) -3.06755
32 2.143028 (0.157103) 2.090307 (0.136778) -2.46012
So on a very contended system we're actually slower? Is this expected?
I think, the result is interesting because its PLE machine. I have to
experiment more with parameters, SPIN_THRESHOLD, and also may be ple_gap
and ple_window.
Alex
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization