On 01/16/2012 09:27 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
[...]
Result for PLE machine: ====================== Machine : IBM xSeries with Intel(R) Xeon(R) X7560 2.27GHz CPU with 32/64 core, with 8 online cores and 4*64GB RAM Kernbench: BASE BASE+patch %improvement mean (sd) mean (sd) Scenario A: case 1x: 161.263 (56.518) 159.635 (40.5621) 1.00953 case 2x: 190.748 (61.2745) 190.606 (54.4766) 0.0744438 case 3x: 227.378 (100.215) 225.442 (92.0809) 0.851446 Scenario B: 446.104 (58.54 ) 433.12733 (54.476) 2.91 Dbench: Throughput is in MB/sec NRCLIENTS BASE BASE+patch %improvement mean (sd) mean (sd) 8 1.101190 (0.875082) 1.700395 (0.846809) 54.4143 16 1.524312 (0.120354) 1.477553 (0.058166) -3.06755 32 2.143028 (0.157103) 2.090307 (0.136778) -2.46012So on a very contended system we're actually slower? Is this expected?
I think, the result is interesting because its PLE machine. I have to experiment more with parameters, SPIN_THRESHOLD, and also may be ple_gap and ple_window.
Alex
_______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
