On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 09:39:11AM +0530, Krishna Kumar2 wrote: > Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 11/25/2011 08:51:57 AM: > > > > My description is not clear again :( > > I mean the same vhost thead: > > > > vhost thread #0 transmits packets of flow A on processor M > > ... > > vhost thread #0 move to another process N and start to transmit packets > > of flow A > > Thanks for clarifying. Yes, binding vhosts to CPU's > makes the incoming packet go to the same vhost each > time. Interesting, but still not sure why. What if you bind the VCPUs but not the vhost thread? > BTW, are you doing any binding and/or irqbalance > when you run your tests? I am not running either at > this time, but thought both might be useful. > > - KK Either pinning or irqbalance is a good idea. Doing neither means you get a random CPU handling interrupts. -- MST _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
