On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 10:04 +0800, Asias He wrote: > Hi, Shsha > > On 11/13/2011 11:00 PM, Sasha Levin wrote: > > On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 12:24 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >> On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 12:12:01AM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote: > >>> This is a patch based on Krishna Kumar's patch series which implements > >>> multiple VQ support for virtio-net. > >>> > >>> The patch was tested with ver3 of the patch. > >>> > >>> Cc: Krishna Kumar<krkumar2@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin<mst@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>> Cc: Rusty Russell<rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> Cc: virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>> Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin<levinsasha928@xxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Any performance numbers? > > > > I tried finding a box with more than two cores so I could test it on > > something like that as well. > > > >> From what I see this patch causes a performance regression on my 2 core > > box. > > > > I'll send an updated KVM tools patch in a bit as well. > > > > Before: > > > > # netperf -H 192.168.33.4,ipv4 -t TCP_RR > > MIGRATED TCP REQUEST/RESPONSE TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET > > to 192.168.33.4 (192.168.33.4) port 0 AF_INET : first burst 0 > > Local /Remote > > Socket Size Request Resp. Elapsed Trans. > > Send Recv Size Size Time Rate > > bytes Bytes bytes bytes secs. per sec > > > > 16384 87380 1 1 10.00 11160.63 > > 16384 87380 > > > > # netperf -H 192.168.33.4,ipv4 -t UDP_RR > > MIGRATED UDP REQUEST/RESPONSE TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET > > to 192.168.33.4 (192.168.33.4) port 0 AF_INET : first burst 0 > > Local /Remote > > Socket Size Request Resp. Elapsed Trans. > > Send Recv Size Size Time Rate > > bytes Bytes bytes bytes secs. per sec > > > > 122880 122880 1 1 10.00 12072.64 > > 229376 229376 > > > > # netperf -H 192.168.33.4,ipv4 -t TCP_STREAM > > MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to > > 192.168.33.4 (192.168.33.4) port 0 AF_INET > > Recv Send Send > > Socket Socket Message Elapsed > > Size Size Size Time Throughput > > bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec > > > > 87380 16384 16384 10.00 4654.50 > > > > netperf -H 192.168.33.4,ipv4 -t TCP_STREAM -- -m 128 > > MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to > > 192.168.33.4 (192.168.33.4) port 0 AF_INET > > Recv Send Send > > Socket Socket Message Elapsed > > Size Size Size Time Throughput > > bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec > > > > 87380 16384 128 10.00 635.45 > > > > # netperf -H 192.168.33.4,ipv4 -t UDP_STREAM > > MIGRATED UDP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to > > 192.168.33.4 (192.168.33.4) port 0 AF_INET > > Socket Message Elapsed Messages > > Size Size Time Okay Errors Throughput > > bytes bytes secs # # 10^6bits/sec > > > > 122880 65507 10.00 113894 0 5968.54 > > 229376 10.00 89373 4683.54 > > > > # netperf -H 192.168.33.4,ipv4 -t UDP_STREAM -- -m 128 > > MIGRATED UDP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to > > 192.168.33.4 (192.168.33.4) port 0 AF_INET > > Socket Message Elapsed Messages > > Size Size Time Okay Errors Throughput > > bytes bytes secs # # 10^6bits/sec > > > > 122880 128 10.00 550634 0 56.38 > > 229376 10.00 398786 40.84 > > > > > > After: > > > > # netperf -H 192.168.33.4,ipv4 -t TCP_RR > > MIGRATED TCP REQUEST/RESPONSE TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET > > to 192.168.33.4 (192.168.33.4) port 0 AF_INET : first burst 0 > > Local /Remote > > Socket Size Request Resp. Elapsed Trans. > > Send Recv Size Size Time Rate > > bytes Bytes bytes bytes secs. per sec > > > > 16384 87380 1 1 10.00 8952.47 > > 16384 87380 > > > > # netperf -H 192.168.33.4,ipv4 -t UDP_RR > > MIGRATED UDP REQUEST/RESPONSE TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET > > to 192.168.33.4 (192.168.33.4) port 0 AF_INET : first burst 0 > > Local /Remote > > Socket Size Request Resp. Elapsed Trans. > > Send Recv Size Size Time Rate > > bytes Bytes bytes bytes secs. per sec > > > > 122880 122880 1 1 10.00 9534.52 > > 229376 229376 > > > > # netperf -H 192.168.33.4,ipv4 -t TCP_STREAM > > MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to > > 192.168.33.4 (192.168.33.4) port 0 AF_INET > > Recv Send Send > > Socket Socket Message Elapsed > > Size Size Size Time Throughput > > bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec > > > > 87380 16384 16384 10.13 2278.23 > > > > # netperf -H 192.168.33.4,ipv4 -t TCP_STREAM -- -m 128 > > MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to > > 192.168.33.4 (192.168.33.4) port 0 AF_INET > > Recv Send Send > > Socket Socket Message Elapsed > > Size Size Size Time Throughput > > bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec > > > > 87380 16384 128 10.00 623.27 > > > > # netperf -H 192.168.33.4,ipv4 -t UDP_STREAM > > MIGRATED UDP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to > > 192.168.33.4 (192.168.33.4) port 0 AF_INET > > Socket Message Elapsed Messages > > Size Size Time Okay Errors Throughput > > bytes bytes secs # # 10^6bits/sec > > > > 122880 65507 10.00 136930 0 7175.72 > > 229376 10.00 16726 876.51 > > > > # netperf -H 192.168.33.4,ipv4 -t UDP_STREAM -- -m 128 > > MIGRATED UDP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to > > 192.168.33.4 (192.168.33.4) port 0 AF_INET > > Socket Message Elapsed Messages > > Size Size Time Okay Errors Throughput > > bytes bytes secs # # 10^6bits/sec > > > > 122880 128 10.00 982492 0 100.61 > > 229376 10.00 249597 25.56 > > > > Why both the bandwidth and latency performance are dropping so > dramatically with multiple VQ? It looks like theres no hash sync between host and guest, which makes the RX VQ change for every packet. This is my guess. -- Sasha. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
