On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 02:54:31PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 22:57:28 +0200, Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 22:52 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 10:24:47PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote: > > > > It'll be a bit harder deprecating it in the future. > > > > > > Harder than ... what ? > > > > Harder than allowing devices not to present it at all if new layout > > config is used. Right now the simple implementation is to use MMIO for > > config and device specific, and let it fallback to legacy for ISR and > > notifications (and therefore, this is probably how everybody will > > implement it), which means that when you do want to deprecate legacy, > > there will be extra work to be done then, instead of doing it now. > > Indeed, I'd like to see two changes to your proposal: > > (1) It should be all or nothing. If a driver can find the virtio header > capability, it should only use the capabilties. Otherwise, it > should fall back to legacy. Your draft suggests a mix is possible; > I prefer a clean failure (ie. one day don't present a BAR 0 *at > all*, so ancient drivers just fail to load.). > (2) There's no huge win in keeping the same layout. Let's make some > cleanups. There are more users ahead of us then behind us (I > hope!). > But I think this is the right direction! > > Thanks, > Rusty. I'll do these changes, thanks! _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
